The old codger survives…

Well choreo5 has come to an end. I went from it straight to a new project so today (19/10/11) is my first day of reflection.

The first thing is how good it was to have a sustained period of time working as a dancer regularly. It was great to work with the others: Tanja, Daisy, Laura, Lara and Jessie, the musicians and John, and to be in a company environment again. It has been very good for my body and though it is far from trouble free the work we did on meditation, body analysis and fitness training have given me some new tools with which to hold up the inexorable advance of decrepitude….

The project has reminded me of the central place of breath within dance and I think that some of the findings we made are seeping into my own approaches when it comes to working with ensemble.

Much of the time during the project I did slightly obsess about how to move from improvised to set material (which did hamper me a little) but I think I leave the project with the conclusion that if you impro enough, have a good outside eye to flag up the good stuff, are clear about your impulses and are relaxed about it, it will eventually settle into a structure which will be repeatable (if you so desire). Phew.

II hope that the work has helped Tanja to reflect and develop some new methodologies for creating ensemble work and look forward to seeing how the work develops.

Go Tanja go!

Jem

Posted in choreography, dancers' perspective | Leave a comment

presentation part 5

This sequence is the result of us taking the next step in the use of breath & movement score method from Part 1 and applying it to create a sequence that has a theme or a starting point. We used the grey area between human-animal as a broad theme and chose instinct / conditioning / reasoning / wild / domesticated as more specific starting points for our movement vocabulary. We then created the sequence collectively by defining the breath score as we created the movement patterns.

The breath is used not just in the process of creating the material but also to drive the movement. It is used to let the dancers find the movement and to gain a real sensation of it rather than artificially placing on top of the sequence.

Posted in choreography, video | Leave a comment

presentation part 4

This duet between Jessie and Laura was the most improvised one, looking for yet another way of connecting with another person – through sensing rather than seeing or touching. This was inspired by my work as a cranio-sacral therapist and my experience of treating people through physical touch but also hands off the body. This duet relies on the dancers connecting with each other on a subtle energy level. Due to its subtle and intimate nature, it is of course very vulnerable for the influence of the audience.

Posted in choreography, video | Leave a comment

presentation part 3

In this double duet, we finally made it into physical contact. Earlier during the research we tried creating contact duet, but failed until the last week of the research. What we previously struggled with was how to move from improvisation into set choreography without losing the essence of the interaction between the dancers (that is so tangible in improvisation) and ending up with just meaningless set of movements.

In the process of creating this duet, we improvised a lot, generating a handful of ‘good moments’ that could be developed further. The two pairs were improvising with two different tasks initially, but somehow ended up with similar foot/head connection, which led us to try to combine the material into one duet. When we started setting the double duets, we build it by meticulously defining the intention behind each move. This led us to create an intention score for the sequence simultaneously with the movement pattern.

Posted in choreography, video | Leave a comment

presentation part 2

The first duet in this clip was based on our research of ways of connecting with each other. This duet is structured improvisation between Daisy and Lara, who first created loose structures independently, focusing on the use of space in their individual movements, and then we used these structures to connect with each other spatially. As a choreographer, I am interested in the underlying connection between the dancers that can be sustained regardless of the dancers moving further away or when coming into physical contact.

This duet breaks away and becomes another duet between Daisy and Laura, as well as a trio with Lara, Jessie and Jem. The sequence for the trio was developed by deducting the material from Part 1. The movement material was manipulated according to an intention: itchiness / spikiness, that was layered on top of the original material. To further develop the material, the trio occupied very tight space, evolving the expression of the movement and creating a contrast to the travelling duet.

The duet between Daisy and Laura was based on material created during the research when we first started working in smaller groups and look at contact work. We applied the method of creating breath & movement scores, but we had not yet discovered a convincing way of connecting with each other to create the duet that would include physical contact and therefore the dancers stayed separate.

Posted in choreography, video | Leave a comment

presentation part 1

This movement material was a by-product of us discovering the method of building breath and movement scores simultaneously. The material itself didn’t have any theme or underlying starting point – we used any movements that happened to link together. The key was to apply the method of creating and become confident with it. Previously, we had discovered how the expression of the movement changed, sometimes significantly, depending on the quality and direction of our breathing. We, therefore, created the basic sequence by continuously being aware and building the breath score as a pattern which could be repeated together with the movement.

Later we played with formations and breaking the sequence with additional tasks, such accumulation of dancers – the dancers start with balancing, not knowing in advance which place they would end up in the group. The order and the length of the accumulation was therefore dictated by the dancers’ ability to balance for an extended period – which was affected by the presence of an audience.

Posted in choreography, video | Leave a comment

photos from the final weekend

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Posted in choreography, photos | Leave a comment

Last choreo5 blog

The choreo5 project has come to an end, it was a really lovely process, we made new discoveries and questioned many methods of choreographing. It’s been an interesting project have been involved in, I will take away a lot from it into my daily and dancing life. The idea of training specifically for a performance or creative period has been particularly useful and something I will keep using in my own practice. My fear of running has almost disappeared and I am actually looking forward to going for a run!

But apart from fitness the project has taught be a lot about self healing, positive imagery and meditation. Now I just have to shift my normal habitual patterns and try to make them part of my routine, that’s the hard part.

In the last week of the choreo5 it really felt like we were a company and we came together to create some really nice work. It felt like the process and preparation  had sunk in and allowed us to create with ease and confidence. It would be great to have a week off then start creating a full length piece.

I’ve really enjoyed working with Tanja and the group, it’s been great having time to get know them as dancers and people. I hope Tanja has got everything she wanted to out of this research project, I have certainly gained a lot of positive experiences and knowledge.

I’m going to miss everyone. As Daisy said bring on choreo5 reunion tour!

:-)

Posted in dancers' perspective | Leave a comment

audience’s influence

In the morning of the presentation of choreo5, I realised how much more important the showing in front of a small audience would be for my research than I had anticipated. I had mainly focused on the presentation as a way of sharing the research findings without thinking of how much the audience could influence the situation.

Throughout the project, we had worked on connecting with each other in a deeper level which can bring underlying strength to the way the dancers execute material or tasks and make it alive. On the other hand, sensing and deeper connections are also vulnerable to be affected by our state of mind and pre-performance nervousness. I became very aware of myself and how I struggled to keep myself grounded and calm, falling in to my old habitual patterns of being which I have been trying to overcome during choreo5.

I believe that awareness is the first step forward and then finding ways to undo old patterns and to replace them with new approaches. We meditated before the first presentation, which seemed to be very useful in reducing the level of anxiety and nervousness amongst us. I, however, feel that as a choreographer I could do more to prepare the dancers for a performance in the future. Perhaps structuring the project so that there are possibilities for the public to observe rehearsals during a creative period, as well focus on building the dancers’ confidence in those situations in order to ease the transition from studio to the stage.

Posted in choreography | Leave a comment

watching unison

One of the hot topics of the presentations was a discussion about unison. The audience members were debating what a unison is, which made me clarify what kind of unison I like to watch or produce. In simple terms, I describe a unison as a group of people moving through the same patterns at the same time. However, this is not what has got me excited when I have seen great unison work. It is the deeper connections between the people on stage, whether through clear intention, or other means, that drive the movement and the power of the group forward. Sometimes the movements can be even fairly raw and unpolished, allowing individual dancers’ interpretations.

As a choreographer, I am interested in individuals – not clones. The debate made me think about how much individuality I can allow in a sequence, so that it could still be considered a unison. Perhaps I shouldn’t even think about it but persist with working on it. It was suggested that maybe the audience need to be educated to widen their appreciation of what unison can be – an interesting point.  choreo5 has certainly left me hungry for delving even deeper with this aspect and to explore breath and other means of creating unison.

Posted in choreography | Tagged , | Leave a comment